Appeal for specific performance was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant. Registry directed to refund admissible court fee following the settlement of the matter between parties.
Court fee to be refunded to appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 506 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2022 (SP)
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE K.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.106, SAI KRUPA GARDEN, GANGAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, A.NARAYANAPURA, MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU – 560 048.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.NALINA R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.VENKATA REDDY S K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court Of Karnataka
W/O J.GOPI,
AGED 49 YEARS, R/AT VARTHUR VILLAGE, HALUBHAVI ROAD, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 087.
R/AT VARTHUR VILLAGE AND HOBLI,
RFA No. 506 of 2022
BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 087. ALSO R/AT OMSHAKTHI TEMPLE ROAD, NEAR DIVYAJOTHI SCHOOL, MADURANAGARA, BENGALURU – 560 087.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2021 PASSED IN OS.NO.290/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Counsel for appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of appeal on ground that matter has been settled between parties amicably out of Court.
Placing memo on record, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
RFA No. 506 of 2022
In view of withdrawal of appeal, Registry is directed to
refund admissible Court fee to appellant.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Sainath Reddy
Jayalakshmi
P.Manjula
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
