A regular first appeal against a judgment for permanent injunction was dismissed for non-prosecution despite the counsel's prayer for time.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.493 OF 2012 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. JAGAJEEVAN RAM VIDYA SAMSTHE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT NO.9, 9/1, 15TH MAIN, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE – 560 054.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.VIJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.H.V.HARISH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2)
2
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96, R/W, O-41, RULE-1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.02.2012 PASSED IN O.S.8165/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Paper books not filed.
prays time.
for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE
ssb
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. JAGAJEEVAN RAM VIDYA SAMSTHE
PANCHAJANYA VIDYA PEETA WELFARE TRUST
THE HEAD MASTER, PANCHAJANYA VIDYA PEETA, HIGH SCHOOL
V. SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
