Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sri v Nagaraj Vs Smt R Chandramma — Partition | Karnataka HC (2022)

Home
Karnataka HC
2022
Sri v Nagaraj Vs Smt R ChandrammaSri v. Nagaraj v Smt R Chandramma

Dismissed

Sri v. Nagaraj v Smt R Chandramma

Karnataka HC18 Aug 2022RFA/369/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA dismissed for non-prosecution. Appellant failed to file required paper books despite the court's rejection of prayer for time.

What did the court decide?

Null

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA

R.F.A.No.369/2012(PAR)

BETWEEN

SRI V NAGARAJ S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/A NO.18, NANDANAVANAM D STREET ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560008

...APPELLANT

(BY SRI G S VENKAT SUBBARAO, ADVOCATE)

AND

1 . SMT R CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, DEAD, LRS OF R1 ARE ALREADY ON RECORD AS R2 TO R9

2 . SRI M R NAGARAJ

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Sri V Nagaraj
respondent
Smt R Chandramma
respondent
Sri M R Nagaraj
respondent
Smt V Ambuja
respondent
Smt V Komala
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 18 Aug 2022 · August
Registered: 3 Mar 2012
Case no.: RFA/369/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V Srishananda

Sri K S Satyanarayana Vs Sri Lingaiah
17 Aug 2022
Ramesha Vs State of Karnataka
17 Aug 2022
Smt.Sumithra Vs the State of Karnataka
17 Aug 2022
Smt Sheela Girish Vs Smt Vajramma
18 Aug 2022

Cite this judgement

Sri v. Nagaraj v Smt R Chandramma, RFA/369/2012 (KA), decided on 18 August 2022.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V. Srishananda

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Null

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In view of the appellant's failure to file paper books and rejection of prayer for time, the Revisional Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution without adjudication on merits.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

H/O LATE LAKSHMIDEVAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS,

a) SRI M N RAMESH S/O LATE M R NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.183, I CROSS, NAZARABAD, MYSORE-570010

b) SMT JAYALAKSHMI

2

W/O SRI C BHAKTHAVATHSALA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A 3^RD CROSS, SANTHRUPTHI NILAYA 4^TH BLOCK, YESHWANTHPURA BANGALORE-560022

c) . SMT N AHALYA W/O SRI V GANESH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.183, I CROSS NAZARABAD MYSORE-570 010

d) SMT M N VEDAVATHI W/O LATE JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.18(SOUTHERN PORTION) NANDANAVANAM D STREET ULSOOR,

BANGALORE-560008

e) SRI M N SRINIVAS S/O LATE M R NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.183, I CROSS NAZARABAD MYSORE-570010

SRI V SAMPATH

S/O LATE M VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/A NO.18, NANDANAVANAM D STREET

ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560008

4 . SRI V NARAYANA S/O LATE M VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

3

R/A NO.32/7, I CROSS SOMESWARAPURA LAYOUT ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560008

5 . SMT V AMBUJA W/O SRI D C RAMU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.32/1, I CROSS SOMESWARAPURA LAYOUT ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560008

6 . SRI V PRASAD, S/O LATE M VENKATARAMAIAH SINCE DECEASES BY HIS LRS

a) SMT P VEENA W/O SRI M L SATHISH, D/O LATE V PRASAD AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

b) SMT DEEPA W/O SRI VENKATAKRISHNAPPA D/O LATE V PRASAD AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

c) SMT P VIDHYA W/O SRI SHIVAKUMAR, D/O LATE V PRASAD AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

d) SMT P ASHWINI W/O SRI VINODH D/O LATE V PRASAD AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

6(a) to (d) ARE R/AT No.32/7 I CROSS, SOMESHWARAPURA LAYOUT

4

ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560 008

SMT V KOMALA W/O SRI T SHIVARAJ, D/O LATE M.VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO.42, POST OFFICE ROAD NALAMPALLI POST DHARMAPURI(TN)-600 686

SMT V NEELAVENI D/O LATE M.VENKATARAMAIAH W/O SRI SHANMUGHANANDAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.16, TELECOM STAFF QUARTERS OPP:CHINMAYA MISSION HOSPITAL INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE-560038

9 . SMT L PADMAVATHI W/O LATE V PADMANABHA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A C/O LAKSHMANAPPA KAMBILLI WEAVERS KILUKOTE KOLAR-563 101

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI B.G.THAMMAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2(b, c AND d); SRI K.VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE FOR R6(a TO d); VIDE ORDER DATED 06.01.2017 LRS OF R1 IS DISPENSED WITH; R2(a), R2(e), R3, R4, R5, R9, R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R1 DEAD AND R2 TO R9 ARE LRS OF R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 25.07.2013; NOTICE TO R8 HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 25.01.2017)

5

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2168/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE POSSESSION AND MESNE PROFITS.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Time prayed by learned counsel for appellant to

file paper books.

Prayed rejected.

Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SBN

Smt V Neelaveni

Coram

AI extract

V. Srishananda

CNR

KAHC010161852012

Topic

Bench

Disposal

Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Sri M S Bhujangaiah Vs Sri M B Jagadeesh

18 Aug 2022

M B Jagadish S/O M S Bhujangaiah Vs M S Bhujangaiah S/O Siddegouda

18 Aug 2022