The High Court of Karnataka dismissed RFA No.232/2006 upon the failure of the appellant to appear and prosecute the appeal against a decree for permanent injunction.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
R.F.A.No.232/2006(INJ)
BETWEEN
SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O SRI JALLEGO0WDA R/O NO 15, CITB LAYOUT, BAPUJINAGAR MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE -26
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI LOKESH K S, ADVOCATE -ABSENT)
AND
2 . SMT.SIDDAMMA W/O LATE KARIYA AGED ABOUT YEARS
BOTH ARE R/O NO 7, CITB LAYOUT, BAPJINAGAR MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE 26
2
S/O C.CHINNASWAMY MAJOR R/AT NO.487, 6TH 'B' CROSS 7TH MAIN ROAD, KST TOWN BENGALURU - 560 060
...RESPONDENTS
(R1 AND R2 SERVED- UNREPRESENTED VIDE ORDER DATED 10.08.2017 R3-SRI C.SRINIVAS APPEARING AS PARTY IN PERSON, SRI.B.K.SANJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:01.10.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6728/91 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Case called twice, none present on behalf of the
appellant.
3
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SBN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O SRI JALLEGOOWDA
K NAGARAJ S/O LATE KARIYA
SMT.SIDDAMMA W/O LATE KARIYA
SRI C.SRINIVAS
MOHAMMED SULEMAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
V. SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
