The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a regular first appeal against a suit for permanent injunction. The court granted six weeks to comply with office objections, failing which the appeal was dismissed without reference to the Bench nearly three years later.
Appeal dismissed without reference to the Bench due to non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 216 OF 2019
BETWEEN
1 . SMT. K M PADMA W/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA, 67 YEARS, NO.22/1, I FLOOR, 33RD MAIN, BHAVANI LAYOUT, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU.
2 . SMT R MADUMATI W/O LATE K M MADHUSUDHAN, 57 YEARS,
3 . SRI SHREYAS S/O LATE K M MADHUSUDHAN, 32 YEARS,
4 . SRI PRAFFUL THEJAS S/O LATE K M MADHUSUDHAN, 31 YEARS,
APPELLANTS 2 TO 4 ALL R/AT NO.11/1, 8TH CROSS, GANAPATHI NAGAR, HOSAKEREHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU.
5 . SRI K M SUDHARSHAN S/O LATE K M MUNISWAMAPPA, 64 YEARS,
RFA.No.216/2019 2
225, T-2, 2ND FLOOR, SURYA RESIDENCY, 6TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK,JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU.
6 . SRI K M PRABHU S/O LATE K M MUNISWAMAPPA, 58 YEARS, NO.294, RAMA IYENGAR ROAD, VV PURAM, BENGALURU. …APPELLANTS
(By Sriyuths Byregowda.N., Advocate)
AND
..RESPONDENTS
(By Sriyuths G.K.BHAVANA, U.SHRADDHA BHAT, NIKHIL S.SINDAGI, Advocates)
This Regular First Appeal filed under section 96 of the CPC
against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.11.2018 passed in O.S. No. 4945/2014 on the file of the V ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, Dismissing the suit for permanent injunction.
RFA.No.216/2019
3
This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Finally, six weeks time is granted to comply office objections, failing which the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.08.04.2022 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : YL C By : MK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. K M PADMA W/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA
SMT R MADUMATI W/O LATE K M MADHUSUDHAN
SRI SHREYAS S/O LATE K M MADHUSUDHAN
SRI PRAFFUL THEJAS S/O LATE K M MADHUSUDHAN
SRI K M SUDHARSHAN S/O LATE K M MUNISWAMAPPA
SRI K M PRABHU S/O LATE K M MUNISWAMAPPA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
