State Bank of India v. Sri Paramananda
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 1808 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
No. 1808 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1808 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1808 OF 2007 (MON-)
BETWEEN:
DIST BAGALKOT, PIN 587313 REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R P UGARGOL, SRI.S.B.HAVALDAR AND SRI.U.ABDUL KHADER, ADVOCATES (ABSENT))
AND:
AGED BAOUT 39 YRS R/AT BELAGALI MUDHOL TQNOW R/AT HOUSE OF SMT KORISHETTI TEACHER BASAVANAGAR MAHALINGAPUR MUDHOL TQ PIN 587312 BAGALKOT DIST
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NARAYAN V YAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R2, NOTICE TO R1 SERVED)
RFA No. 1808 of 2007
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASDIE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.186/2003 DATED 07.04.2007 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, JAMAKHANDI SITTING AT MUDHOL INSOFAR AS THE REJECTION OF THE CLAIM OF THE APPELLANT IN RESPECT OF CROP LOAN AND DECREE THE SUIT AS PRAYED FOR IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Court notice is served in respect of sole appellant on
24.03.2022 and till date the appellant has not engaged a counsel.
Counsel for respondent No.2 is present.
It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter in spite of service of court notice on 24.03.2022 and has not engaged any counsel or appeared personally. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SH
State Bank of India Branch Mudhol
Sri Paramananda S/o Mahadev Kulkarni
Sri Siddappa Ishwarappa Nuchi
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court