Dismissed
Smt Shanthawwa v. Holeppa
Karnataka HCRFA/1660/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court at Dharwad Bench dismissed the regular first appeal for non-prosecution since the appellants failed to engage counsel or appear personally despite notice issuance.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
RFA No. 1660 of 2006
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
¶4
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
¶5
BEFORE
¶6
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1660 OF 2006 (SP-)
¶7
BETWEEN:
¶8
- SMT SHANTHAWWA W/O VITTAL KALAL, AGED ABOUT 42 YRSOCC HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O LOKAPUR, TALUK MUDHOL, BAGALKOT DISTRICT 587313
¶9
- SMT LAXMAVVA W/O SANJEEVAPPA KALAL, AGED ABOUT 70 YRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O LOKAPUR, TALUK: MUDHOL, BAGALKOT DITRICT 587313
¶10
- VITTAL S/O BHIMAPPA KALAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, OCC OCCUPATION, R/O LOKAPUR, MUDHOL, BAGALKOT DISTRICT- 587313
¶11
…APPELLANTS
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Smt Shanthawwa W/o Vittal Kalal
- appellant
Smt Laxmavva W/o Sanjeevappa Kalal
- appellant
Vittal S/o Bhimappa Kalal
- respondent
Holeppa S/o Rudrappa Muddapur
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1660/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court