counsel for the appellant, though there are sufficient material evidence to show that there was road traffic accident and in the said accident, the appellant-claimant suffered injuries, the Tribunal dismissed the claim petition by holding that the accident was due to a fall from height and without making any quantification of the compensation. But it is argued that the appellant was working under the employment of respondent No.1, and there was road traffic accident and in the said accident the appellant-claimant suffered injuries during the course of employment. Therefore, under these circumstances, the Tribunal ought to have made quantification of compensation on different heads, but the Tribunal has not determined the compensation on each head to be awarded. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and without appreciating evidence on record, since the appreciation of evidence is completely left to the Tribunal, the matter requires to be remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration for determining the aspect of rash and negligent act, liability and determining the quantum of compensation. Even though the
