Miscellaneous First Appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution as the appellant, being absent and having no advocate, was found uninterested in prosecuting the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A No.4548/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2022
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4548/2013 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.H.K.GEETHA @ GHEETHAMMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS W/O SRI B.RAMESH ADITYA R/AT NO.85, 3RD MAIN ROAD 2ND STAGE, BAPUJI NAGARA BANGALORE – 560 026 ...APPELLANT
(BY SMT.H.K.GEETHA [ABSENT])
AND:
SRI B.RAMESH ADITYA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O LATE BALLARAPPA R/AT NO.1958, 2ND MAIN 40TH CROSS, JAYANAGARA 4TH BLOCK BANGALORE – 560 069 …RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.03.2013 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT IV, BANGALORE IN M.C.NO.1501/2011.
M.F.A No.4548/2013
2
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KSR
Smt. H.K. Geetha @ Gheethamma
Sri B. Ramesh Aditya
K.S. Mudagal
S. Rachaiyah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
