On a motion filed by the appellants seeking to withdraw their appeal against a Motor Vehicles Act judgment dated 27.11.2017, the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MFA No.4230 OF 2020(MV)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
MASTENAHALLI, VELAGALABURRE, KOLAR – 563 126.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.PRAMOD GOWDA T.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 052.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.11.2017 IN MVC NO 2891/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XX ACMM AND MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU(SCCH-24), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a
memo seeking permission of this court to withdraw the appeal.
The memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
HA/-
Mr. Nagaraj
Mrs. Saraswathamma
Mr. Mahaboob Shariff
IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
H. T. Nandhaprabhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
