The High Court disposed of an appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court noted that the injured respondent had received full and final settlement compensation from the appellant during the hearing, leading to an order of disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
M.F.A.NO.4052/2013 (WC)
BETWEEN:
M/s V.K.COIR INDUSTRIES, VIGNA SANTE ROAD, NONAVINAKERE, TIPTUR TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS SUPERVISOR VIJAYAKUMAR
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI K HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.B.SOMAPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
2
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30(1) OF WC ACT, 1923 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE AWARD DATED: 18.01.2013 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER, WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION, SUB DIVISION – 1 BENGALURU IN W.C.A/NFC/CR.44/2009 AND REMAND THE CASE TO THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER FOR FRESH CONSIDERATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND ETC.,
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Both appellant as well as respondent No.1 present. Learned counsel representing them are also present. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 filed a memo with regard to receipt of Rs.50,000/- on the last date of hearing on behalf of respondent No.1. Memo duly signed by respondent No.1.
In view of the same, the appeal is disposed off.
Sd/JUDGE
NM
M/s V.K.COIR INDUSTRIES
V.K.VENKATESH
THE REGIONAL OFFICER, COIR BOARD
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
