The First Appellate Court held that the appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the MV Act is abated due to the death of the appellants and dismissed it.
The appeal was dismissed on the ground of abatement due to the death of the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
M.F.A.NO.3890/2018 (MV-D)
BETWEEN :
… APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.G. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
NO/2-319, RAJIV GANDHI SALAI, KARAPAKKAM, TAMILNADU, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PIN-600097.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI RAVI S., SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R1-SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:02/04/2018, PASSED IN MVC NO.797/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MACT, MANGALURU, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND ETC.,
THIS M.F.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Sri G.Ravishankar Shastry, learned counsel for the appellants/claimants submitted that the appellants
are said to have dead.
Therefore, the appeal stands abated in view of the death of appellants in the present appeal.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal stands abated due to the death of the appellants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Lidya Fernandes
Mrs. Mary
Mr. Naveen Poojary
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
