This miscellaneous first appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the suit giving rise to the appeal had already been disposed of by the trial court on 29.11.2022. Pending interim applications were also disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2302 OF 2015 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.VARUN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.V. VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court Of Karnataka
MFA No. 2302 of 2015
MFA No. 2302 of 2015
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI.LOKESH BOOVANAHALLI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R8; SRI.M.S.ASHWIN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R9; SRI.K.V.LAKSHMINARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R10; SRI.S.VENKATESH SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R1 – SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 09.07.2019, APPEAL AGAINST R3, R6 AND R7 IS DISMISSED)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43, RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 12.1.2015 PASSED IN I.A.NO.14 IN O.S.NO.1710/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE 17TH ADDITIONAL
MFA No. 2302 of 2015
CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING IA NO.14 FILED U/O 39, RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant submits that suit, out of which this appeal arises, has been disposed of on 29.11.2022. In view of same, appeal has become infructuous.
Taking submission on record, appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of dismissal of main appeal, pending I.As does
not survive for consideration and same are disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
Hemavathi
Hemanth Kumar
Dhananjaya Reddy
P. Muni Reddy
M. Nagaraj
M. Purushottam N Reddy
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
