Dinesha a R v. Yogisha B K
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the appellant filed a memo seeking withdrawal on the ground of settlement before Lok Adalat.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn; the deposit amount of Rs.25,000/- is ordered to be refunded to the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
M.F.A. NO.2192/2020 (MV)
BETWEEN:
DINESHA A.R. S/O RENUKAPPA, AGE: 37 YEARS, DRIVER CUM R.C. OWNER OF AUTORICKSHAW BEARING NO.KA-13/B-6394 R/O SRINIVASANAGAR FARM HOUSE ARSIKERE TOWN - 573 103, HASSAN DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI B.L.KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- YOGISHA B.K.
- S/O KANUMAPPA,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DINESHA A.R.
- respondent
YOGISHA B.K.
- respondent
THE DIVISION MANAGER IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/2192/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court