The Motor Accident Claim Appeal was dismissed as not pressed by the appellant, resulting in the disposal of the matter without substantive decision on the compensation claim.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed; pending applications disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
M.F.A.NO.1983 OF 2016 (MV)
BETWEEN:
SMT. NAGAMMA @ NAGMANI, W/O LATE LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.9, 5TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, T. DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE – 560 057.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.K.M.RAVIKUMAR, ADV.)
AND:
SRI.M.S.SRIRAM, ADV. FOR R2)
2
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.8.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.2199/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE 8TH ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, 33RD ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS M.F.A. COMING ON FOR ‘ORDERS’ THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo seeking permission for withdrawal of the appeal
as not pressed.
2. The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
ssb
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Nagamma @ Nagmani
Sri. Papegowda G.H.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
J.M. Khazi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
