The Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act was dismissed as withdrawn upon the appellant admitting instructions to withdraw the memo, which was recorded by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1477/2020 (FC)
BETWEEN: SMT. VIDYALAKSHMI W/O MAHADEVA D/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED 27 YEARS, R/AT NO.168, SRIRAMPURA, MANANDAWADI ROAD, MYSURU – 570 008. ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI NARAYANA SWAMY .H, ADV. FOR SRI SANGAMESH R.B, ADV.)
AND: SRI MAHADEVA M S/O. CHIKKAHYDEGOWDA, AGED 33 YEARS, R/AT KALLEHALLI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU-570001. ... RESPONDENT
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.08.2019 PASSED IN M.C.NO.857/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
2
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR “ORDERS” THIS DAY, G.NARENDAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Memo is preferred by the appellant’s counsel praying
leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. Memo is not countersigned by the appellant.
Narayanaswamy.H (Roll No.KAR 1967/2013) representing the counsel Sri Sangamesh R.B. submits that instructions have been received to withdraw the appeal.
taken on record.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Chs CT-HR
Smt. Vidyalakshmi
Sri Mahadeva M.
G. Narendar
C.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
