In a miscellaneous first appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(d) CPC against an order dismissing a petition under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on 01.12.2022.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it before appropriate Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MFA No. 104 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court Of Karnataka
MFA No. 104 of 2022
MEDIHALA POST, VOKKALERI HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VINOD REDDY V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(d) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.03.2021 PASSED IN MISC.NO.1/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants submits that appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it before appropriate Court.
MFA No. 104 of 2022
withdrawn with liberty to file it before appropriate Court.
by placing them with photostat copies.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Ramaswamy, S/O Appanna through others
Sri. D.K.Rangaswamy
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
