The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appellant to withdraw the income tax appeal with liberty to revive it later. The appeal was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw appeal with liberty to revive; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M. ADIGA
ITA No.148/2018
BETWEEN
SRI. M. R. SEETHARAM (INDIVIDUAL) GOKULA HOUSE, GOKULA, MATHIKERE, MSR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 054. PAN: AGDPS 5886 M
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE) AND
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6(3)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, 6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 095.
…RESPONDENT
THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 27.10.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO. 1220/BANG/2015 AND CROSS OBJECTION NO. 224/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007 [VIDE ANNEXURE-A], PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO (A) TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS
2
OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND ETC.,
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY P.S. DINESH KUMAR J. , MADE / DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri. A. Shankar, Senior Advocate for the appellant has filed a memo of even date, seeking leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to seek revival of the appeal, if so advised.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
JY
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. M. R. Seetharam
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
Umesh M. Adiga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
