On an application for further time for compliance of office objections in a Civil Revision Petition, the High Court of Karnataka noted the petitioner's delay of nearly a year and dismissed the petition for non-compliance.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.100073 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
BANDEPPANAVAR S/O SIDDAPPA SHANTHAVEERAPPA AGE.61 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O K. AYYANAHALLI VILLAGE, TAL. HADAGALI, DIST. BALLARI.
...PETITIONER [BY MS.GAYATRI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MALLIKARJUN B.HIREMATH., ADVOCATE]
AND:
4 . IMAMBI D/O MAHALINGA SAB BADE KASHAPPANAVA AGE:57 YEARS, R/O K. AYYANAHALLI VILLAGE, TAL. HADAGALI, DIST.BALLARI-583101.
2
| 5 . | SMT. SABINABEE @ SHAJANA BEE D/O MAHALINGA SAB BADE KASHAPPANAVAR. |
|---|---|
| 6 . | SMT. GUDUMABI W/O MAHALINGA SAB BADE KASHAPPANAVAR AGE:49 YEARS, R/O K. AYYANAHALLI VILLAGE, TAL. HADAGALI, DIST.BALLARI-583101. |
| 7 . | AVARAGERI BHEEMAPPA S/O KALLAPPA AGE.57 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE R/O ALLIPURA VILLAGE TAL. HADAGALI DIST.BALLARI-583101. |
| 8 . | SMT. V SUJATHA W/O V. ADINARAYANA, AGE.43 YEARS, R/O 9THWARD, HOLAGUNDI ROAD, HADAGALI TOWN, DIST. BALLARI-583101. |
| 9 . | SRIHARI S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGE.35 YEARS, R/O S.S. LAYOUT, B BLOCK, DAVANAGERE CITY DIST. DAVANAGERE. …RESPONDENTS |
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS CRP COMING FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Ms.Gayatri., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.Mallikarjunswamy B.Hiremath., for petitioner has
appeared in person.
3
The matter is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections.
Counsel for petitioner submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply office objections.
Submission is noted.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the matter was listed on 19.11.2021. On that day, finally two weeks time was granted to comply office objections.
It’s almost a year, the petitioner has not instructed
the counsel on record to comply office objections. Therefore, this Court finds no justification to grant further time to comply office objections. Hence, the Civil Revision
Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- JUDGE
TKN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant further time to the petitioner to comply with office objections given delay of nearly a year.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BANDEPPANAVAR S/O SIDDAPPA SHANTHAVEERAPPA
BADE SAB S/O MAHALINGA SAB BADE KASHAPPANAVAR
SMT. B. RESHMA BANU W/O RAHIMAN SAB
KUM. RIZWA BANU D/O RAHIMAN SAB
IMAMBI D/O MAHALINGA SAB BADE KASHAPPANAVA
SMT. SABINABEE @ SHAJANA BEE
JYOTI MULIMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
