A criminal revision petition filed under sections 397 and 401 CrPC was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel submitted a memo stating the dispute had been settled.
Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.71 of 2020
BETWEEN:
Ms.REENA MISHRA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS WIFE OF MOHITH MISRA D/O J.P.TRIPATHI NOHQ TRIAL, COURT (U) AIRFORCE, CCC, JC NAGAR POST HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560 006
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.V.ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Mr. MOHITH MISHRA SON OF PADMAKAR MISHRA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 407/1, DIOMOND MANSION 5TH FLOOR, GK MARG WORLI, MUMBAI-400018
… RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. JAYASHREE PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04.12.2019 PASSED BY THE LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
2
CITY (CCH-59) IN CRL.A.NO.1150/2018 BY ALLOWING THE REVISION.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE/PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking permission to withdraw the petition as not pressed.
has acknowledged the above submission and she has signed the memo.
Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
vs
Ms.REENA MISHRA
Mr. MOHITH MISHRA
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
