The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a criminal revision petition filed under sections 397 and 401 CrPC. The petitioner failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution and non-compliance with court directives.
The criminal revision petition is dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.327 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI NANDEESHA V. S/O VASU B AGED ABOUT 39 YERS R/AT NO.120, PUMP HOUSE ATTIBELE ROAD, SUDHAMANAGARA BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PIN-562 106.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KRISHNEGOWDA B.D. ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI SEENAPPA S. S/O SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.656/1 VGP LAYOUT KADLU, MADIWALA POST, BANGALORE-560 068
… RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION, SENTENCE AND FINE PASSED IN CC
Crl.R.P.No.327/2022 2
NO.16412/2017 DATED 02.02.2019 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU AND SUSPEND THE SENTENCE PASSED IN CRL.APPL. NO.523/2019 BY THE LEARNED LXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, (CCH.66) ORDER DATED 06.03.2020.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appear for the petitioner either through physically or through video conference.
A perusal of the order sheet would go to show that, in spite of granting several and sufficient opportunities of not less than four times including 'as a final chance', the petitioner neither complied the office objections nor shown any reasons for non-compliance of office objections. No reasons are forthcoming for non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Crl.R.P.No.327/2022 3
Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and for
non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
TL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition should be dismissed due to non-prosecution and failure to comply with office objections.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Nandeesh V.
Sri Seenappa S.
H.B. Prabhakara Sastry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
