Panchalingiah v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.144/2020
BETWEEN:
SRI PANCHALINGIAH S/O LATE. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT HEMMIGERPURA VIDYAPEETA POST, KENGERI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 560 060.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE CITY WING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE – 560 001.
... RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2019 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.190/2013 ON THE FILE OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, (CCH-78) BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE PROCEEDINGS AS NOT MAINTAINABLE FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS AND INTERDICT PROCEEDINGS.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
Case called out. None appears. Though the matter listed third time before the Court for compliance of office objections, the counsel for the petitioner remained absent. Though, Sufficient opportunities having been given to the petitioner, the petitioner has not complied the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the case.
JUDGE
Bss.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Panchalingiah
State of Karnataka
S. Rachaiyah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court