High Court of Karnataka dismissed Criminal Revision Petition No.142/2019 for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear on the hearing date following a notice of absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.142/2019
BETWEEN:
SRI C.H. SELVARAJ, S/O C.H. MADHAVAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.26, OLD NO.612-A, UPSTAIRS OF R.K. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, 11TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 011. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI NAIK N.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI L.M. KODANDARAMA SHETTY, S/O MUNIRAMAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT NO.1554, 5TH CROSS, BSK 1ST STAGE, 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RAGHAVENDRA K, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER ON CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.246/2017 DATED 22.12.2018 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT IN C.C.NO.14717/2013 DATED 24.01.2017 BY THE LX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-61) AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE XXIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT
2
BENGALURU DATED 24.01.2017 IN C.C.NO.14717/2013 CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This Court vide order dated 31.03.2022, taking note of the absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner granted one more opportunity and also made it clear that if the learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed since the revision petition is not yet admitted. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution since the revision petition is not admitted.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri C.H. Selvaraj
Sri L.M. Kodandarama Shetty
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
