High Court Criminal Revision Petition where petitioner sought to set aside conviction order. Petitioner filed memo stating matter settled amicably, fine paid, case closed, and therefore does not press the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1054 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
Mrs. Hemalatha Ramu, W/o D.S.Jagadish, Aged about 34 years, R/at No.330A, 4th Main, 3rd Phase, Manjunath Nagar, Bengaluru-560010.
…Petitioner
(By Sri B.G.Vijaya Kumara Swamy, Advocate)
AND:
Sri Srikanth R.Pawar S/o Rajeswar Rao, Aged about 35 years, R/at No.605, 3rd Cross, 7th Main, HMT Layout, R.T.Nagar, Ganganagar Post, Bengaluru-560032.
…Respondent
(Respondent-served)
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment and order of the LXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-63) in Crl.A.No.1064/2018 and the judgment and order of conviction and fine imposed by the XV ACMM, Bengaluru vide judgment dated 11.05.2018 passed in C.C.No.43/2015.
:: 2 ::
This Criminal Revision Petition coming on for orders through video conferencing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the matter has been settled amicably before the trial court and that the petitioner has paid the fine amount to the respondent and also to the Government. The case has been closed and in
this view petitioner does not press the petition.
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
ckl/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Hemalatha Ramu
Sri Srikanth R.Pawar
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
