Hon'ble Justice M.G. Uma dismissed Criminal Petition No.9404/2021 under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prying to enlarge bail. The petitioner was absent for multiple hearings, leading the court to conclude he was uninterested in prosecuting the matter. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
The criminal petition praying for enlargement on bail stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9404/2021
BETWEEN :
Raghava.M Son of Veeraiah Aged about 30 years Residing at Chandapura Bangalore – 560099 Permanent: Engalooru, Anasagara Mandalum, Nellore, Andra Pradesh - 524001
… PETITIONER
(By Sri:Ramesha H.N, Advocate)
AND :
The State of Karnataka By Kaggalipura Police Station Bangalore Rural Rep by S.P.P High Court premises Bangalore - 560001
… RESPONDENT
(By Sri: V.S Vinayaka - HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.141/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 341, 302, 120B, 34, 149 of IPC PENDING
2
ON THE FILE THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL AT BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent even
though the matter is passed over and called for second time.
The order sheet discloses that the petition is of the year 2021. But the petitioner remained absent when the matter was listed on 05.01.2022, 04.02.2022 and even on 18.02.2022.
It is apparent on the face of the record that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter.
Hence, this petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
RJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail petition should be dismissed due to the consistent absence of the petitioner despite multiple listings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghava.M
The State of Karnataka
M.G. UMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
