Sri. Mahadev v. Smt. Umadevi
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal against acquittal for cheque dishonour was dismissed as the appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed on withdrawal.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.919 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI. MAHADEV SON OF CHIKKABASAVAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.116/11, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE - 560 018.
...COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MOHAN K.N., ADVOCATE)
AND
SMT. UMADEVI WIFE OF R. HARISH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.C, RAJ BHAVAN QUARTERS, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
...ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri. Mahadev Son of Chikkabasaviah
- respondent
Smt. Umadevi Wife of R. Harish
Coram
J.M. Khazi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.A/919/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court