The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a bail petition regarding offences under IPC 363 and POCSO Act by dismissing the petition after the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9133/2022
BETWEEN:
VENKATESH S/O LATE MANIKYA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.59/4 1ST MAIN, ST.ALTRAT SCHOOL RAJEEV GANDHINAGAR, LAGGERE BENGALURU CITY- 560 070
….PETITIONER
(BY SRI.A.N.RADHAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
(BY SMT.RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP FOR R1)
*****
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.208/2022 REGISTERED BY RAJAGOPAL NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 363 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 8 & 12 OF POCSO ACT, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-1, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal of petition.
Memo is placed on record. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
PKN
VENKATESH S/O LATE MANIKYA
STATE OF KARNATAKA
VICTIM D/O VENKATESH
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
