Petitioner sought to quash cheque dishonour proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act. The High Court dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn following an out-of-court settlement between parties.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with parties having settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.P No. 814 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 814 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
K S VIJAY S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA TEACHER, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, EX - PRESIDENT BAR ASSOCIATION, LAXMI BAZAR, CHITRADURGA TOWN - 571501
Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI. SHIVANANDA D S., ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONER
AND:
D SHANMUKHAPPA S/O D ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O KOTE EXTENSION, NEAR VENUGOPALSWAMY TEMPLE, HOLALKERE TOWN, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT- 577526
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 23.04.2018 AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.138 OF N.I.ACT IN C.C.NO.908/2018 (PCR NO.43/2018) ON THE
CRL.P No. 814 of 2019
FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLALKERE, INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
dated 21.11.2022 with a prayer to dismiss the petition as withdrawn since the parties have settled the matter out of Court.
I.A.No.1/2019 does not survive for consideration and is
accordingly, disposed of.
SD/JUDGE
AG
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K S VIJAY
D SHANMUKHAPPA
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
