The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 439 CrPC for enlarging bail, as the petitioners failed to comply with office objections despite five adjournment opportunities.
The petition stands dismissed for noncompliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7185/2022
BETWEEN:
2
MANGARASA VALAYAPALYAM VILLAGE KARUVELAM KADDU, AVINASI TALUK TIPATURU DISTRICT TAMILNADU-641 654 ….PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NAGENDRA G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ALANAHALLI POLICE STATION REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.95/2021(S.C.NO.12/2022) OF ALANAHALLY P.S., MYSURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/Ss. 376(D), 397, 120(B), 109, 324, 326 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners called-out.
Absent.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners in the Morning Sessions as well as in Afternoon Session.
3
It is noticed from the order sheet that, the petition is being regularly adjourned for compliance of office objections. In spite of granting five opportunities, office objections are not complied with. It appears that the petitioners are least interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for noncompliance of office.
Sd/-
KGR* CT:NR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition under Section 439 CrPC should be allowed which has not been complied with office objections despite five adjournments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ANTHONI JOSEPH S/O SUSAIYAPPAN
PRAKASH @ ARAVINDAN .S
SELVARAJ @ SELVAM S/O LATE RANGASWAMY
MURUGESHN .N
STATE OF KARNATAKA
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
