Dismissed

Sri.Nataraj K v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Sept 2022CRL.P/5796/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed to quash an FIR and complaint. The court allowed counsel to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent charge sheet, and disposed of the petition and a connected application as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to challenge the charge sheet. Petition disposed as withdrawn.

Sri.Nataraj K Vs the State of Karnataka — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

CRL.P No. 5796 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5796 OF 2022

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI.NATARAJ K.,

¶9

LATE KRISHNAPPA

¶10

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶11

OCCUPATION BANK EMPLOYEE.

¶12

SHAKUNTALA

¶13

W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS OCCU. HOUSE WIFE.

¶14

RADHA K.,

¶15

D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA

¶16

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶17

OCCU :KARNATAKA RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.

¶18

Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶19

GIRIJA K., D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS OCCUPATION CIVIL ENGINEER

¶20

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 23 BEERESHWARA NILAYA 3^rd MAIN, CHANNEL ROAD, HALASURU, BENGALURU – 560 008.

¶21

¶22

CRL.P No. 5796 of 2022

¶23

…PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SRI. KALEEMULLA SHARIFF, ADVOCATE FOR SMT.SUKANYA H.D., ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HALASURU POLICE,

¶27

REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶28

SMT. SHILPA N.B., W/O NATARAJ K., D/O BASAVARAJAPPA N.S.,

¶29

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS NO.94/A, GOURISHANKAR IDEAL HOME TOWNSHIP RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 098.

¶30

…RESPONDENTS

¶31

(BY SMT.K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI H.R.SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶32

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

¶33

OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR IN CR.NO.33/2022 REGISTERED BY HULSOOR POLICE STATION

¶34

FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT PENDING BEFORE THE X ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU.

¶35

¶36

CRL.P No. 5796 of 2022

¶37

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶38

ORDER

¶39

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 would submit that pursuant to registration of crime in Crime No.33/2022, the police, after investigation, have filed a charge sheet against the petitioners.

¶40

Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to raise a challenge to the charge sheet filed.

¶41

With the liberty as sought for, petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶42

I.A.No.1/2022 also stands disposed, as a consequence.

¶43

Sd/JUDGE

¶44

BKP

¶45

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 356

Sri.Nataraj K v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.Nataraj K v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C Puttarudraiah Vs S Vanitha

Ranjith Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri B R Shiva Murthy Vs State of Karnataka

Jayaram Vs State of Karnataka

Mrs M Abisa Khader Vs State of Karnataka by S.H.O.

Mr S Sampath Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka