Dismissed

Lakshmisha @ Lakshmish B S v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC14 Dec 2022CRL.A/551/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An appeal under Section 438 Cr.P.C. praying for anticipatory bail was filed by four appellants facing charges under IPC and SC/ST (POA) Act. The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal because the appellants' counsel was absent and objected extensions were not removed.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed due to the absence of the appellants' counsel and failure to remove office objections.

Lakshmisha @ Lakshmish B S Vs State of Karnataka — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 14^th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2021

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

Lakshmisha @ Lakshmish B.S., S/o B.L.Siddappa, Aged about 44 years, 5^th Main, Near Old Last Bus Stop, Lakshmidevi Nagar, Bengaluru North, Nandini Layout, Bengaluru-560096.

¶8

Ravi Kumar K., S/o Late Krishnappa, Aged about 32 years, #34, Maramma Temple Road, Kallanayakanahalli, Sompura, Dobbespet, Bengaluru Rural-562111.

¶9

Kempasidda @ Kemparaju, S/o Thimmaiah, Aged about 33 years, Kallunayakanahalli, Sompura, Dobbespet, Bengaluru Rural-562111.

¶10

Kemparaju @ Kemparaju G., S/o Govindappa, Aged about 33 years, Kallanayakanahalli, Sompura, Dobbespet, Bengaluru Rural-562111.

¶11

…Appellants

¶12

(By Sri R.Ravi, Advocate - Absent)

¶13

:: 2 ::

¶14

AND:

¶15

State of Karnataka By Dobbespet Police Station, Bengaluru Rural-562111 Represented by State Public Prosecutor, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru-560001.

¶16

Thirumalesh K., S/o Kenchaiah, Krishnapura, Sompura Holli, Nelamangala Thaluk,

¶17

Bengaluru-562111.

¶18

…Respondents

¶19

(By Sri Mahesh Shetty, HCGP for R1; Smt P.L.Vandana, Advocate for R2)

¶20

This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.11/2021 registered by Dobbespet Police Station, Bengaluru District for the offence p/u/s 143, 147, 384, 447, 504, 506 read with 149 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

¶21

This Criminal Appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The appellants’ counsel is absent. Inspite of giving sufficient time, the appellants’ counsel has not removed the office objections.

¶24

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is

¶25

present.

¶26

:: 3 ::

¶27

Learned High Court Government Pleader

¶28

submits that the police have filed ‘B’ report. Probably this could be the reason for the appellants not showing interest for removing the office objections. Therefore appeal is dismissed.

¶29

Sd/JUDGE

¶30

Kmv/-

Lakshmisha @ Lakshmish B S v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmisha @ Lakshmish B S v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pavan @ Pavankumar Vs State of Karnataka

Sri C Nagarajaiah, Vs the C B I

Lokesh M @ Loki Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Prema Vs State of Karnataka by

Sri Ravikumar @ Ravi Vs State by Hoskote Police Station

Mr. Kalyan Kumar Vs State of Karnataka