In Criminal Appeal No.486 of 2017, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant, who represented himself, was not interested in continuing the prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.486 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANIL F.K., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O F.H. KULAGATTI, R/AT NO.2932, 14TH CROSS, 2ND A MAIN, BSK II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070.
...COMPLAINANT/ APPELLANT
(BY SRI. ANIL F.K., ABSENT)
AND
SRI. M.S. BADRINATH, MAJOR IN AGE, S/O L. SURENDRANATH, PRANAV RADHA KRISHNA, TRANQUIL, NO.67/7, K.R. ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004.
...ACCUSED/ RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL FILED U/S 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED 1.12.2016 PASSED BY THE XVI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGLAURU CITY IN C.C. NO.30176/2014 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
2
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to retire along with copy of letter addressed to the appellant and acknowledgment.
In view of the same, he is permitted to retire. It appears,
appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
LL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Anil F.K.
Sri. M.S. Badrinath
J.M. Khazi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
