This criminal appeal against an acquittal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant had no representation and had not prosecuted the matter over six hearing dates.
Criminal Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.A.No.475/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 475/2017
BETWEEN:
SRI S.SALEEM PASHA SON OF SUBAN SAB AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.8, 2ND MAIN 7TH CROSS, VINAYAKANAGAR ADUGODI POST SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI.S, ADV. (ABSENT))
AND
SRI MOHAMMED FAZLULLA SON OF LATE ABDUL JALEEL AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RETIRED TEACHER KEREBILLIACHI CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577 218 ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. IQBAL AHAMED KHAN, ADV)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 13.01.2017 PASSED BY THE XXI ADDL. C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.11526/2016 ACQUITTING THE
CRL.A.No.475/2017
2
RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I.ACT AND ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellant. The records show that since last six hearing dates, there was no representation for the appellant. This appeal is against the order of acquittal. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
PKN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Saleem Pasha
Mohammed Fazlulla
K.S.Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
