This court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the appellant under Section 378(4) CrPC for non-prosecution, noting the appellant's lack of representation and disinterest in proceeding.
None. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.373 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
SMT. SARASAMMA W/O THIMMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS NO 224, MAHITH NIVAS REDDY COLONY YEMLUR, (NEAR MARATHALLI) BANGALORE
… COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT
(BY SRI. D.S.JAYARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M/S JAYARAJ & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES)
AND:
SMT. G KAMALA W/O SRI H S SHIVAMARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NO.124, PWD OFFICE ROAD, ANEKAL TOWN, ANEKAL TALUK
...ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S.M.ANEES AHMED, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.01.2011 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF FAST TRACK (SESSIONS) JUDGE-III, (MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.25062/2010, CONSEQUENTLY, CONFIRM THE ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 14.05.2010 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 24TH ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.29672/2008; b) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE
2
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for appellant.
No representation for appellant even in the
afternoon session.
Vide order dated 17.10.2022, a conditional order
was passed to the effect that if today appellant fails to go on with the matter, appeal would be dismissed for nonprosecution.
It appears appellant is not interested in prosecuting
the appeal.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sarasamma W/o Thimma Reddy
Smt. G Kamala W/o Sri H S Shivamarigowda
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
