vengeance the PSI has filed a private complaint against the petitioners. The petitioners have also filed a complaint against the said PSI, Aigali, as he demanded a sum of Rs.10.00 lakhs bribe and the same has been reduced to Rs.5.00 Lakhs later, and as they could not pay that amount, in order to fix them in a criminal case, he has invented this method of fixing them in this case. Therefore, he secured the presence of the petitioners to Aigali Police Guest House and there he demanded money and thereafter, as the amount was not paid, at 8.30 p.m., he prepared a private complaint and lodged the same before the court. Of course, some materials are placed before the court to show that one Mr. Aruna Nayak, Police Inspector, Crime Division, Regional Office, Belgavi, who has conducted enquiry against the PSI, the said Police Inspector gave his finding that the said demand by the police is tentatively established. However, at this stage, the court cannot exclusively rely upon the said report as a conclusive proof. No material is placed before the court to show that the Disciplinary Authority has passed any order in respect of the said inquiry conducted by the Police Inspector.
