Criminal Appeal filed for bail under SC/ST (POA) Act dismissed as the appellant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal before the High Court of Karnataka.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.322 OF 2022
BETWEEN
YOGESH K.L. @ YOGI @ GUNDA S/O. LOKESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS PERMANENT RESIDING AT: KADADENAHALLI VILLAGE
MALUR TALUK PRESENTLY R/AT: GOPALAPPA’S HOUSE BACK SIDE ROAD OF FLOWER MANDI HOSAKOTE TOWN BENGALURU RURAL – 562 114.
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI RAVINDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. RENY SEBASTIAN, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
S/O. KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT: THALAKUNTE VILLAGE MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 130. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI R.D. RENUKARADHYA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015, PRAYING TO ORDER THE RELEASE OF THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN SPL.S.C.NO.10/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 341, 302 R/W 149 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE/PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel Sri Ravindra Gowda representing
Smt. Reny Sebastian for appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
HB/-
Sd/JUDGE
YOGESH K.L. @ YOGI @ GUNDA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SRI K. KIRAN KUMAR @ SARATHI
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
