The High Court at Bengaluru disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR. The Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to comply with office objections despite multiple time grants.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.180 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ARUN K.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VISHWA MURTHY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FIR IN CR.NO.232/2015 DATED 18.06.2015 FILED BY ULLALA POLICE STATION, DASHINA KANNADA, UNDER IPC 1860 ACT AND SECTIONS 385, 507, 406, 420, 387, 389, 201, 120 (b) R/W 34 OF IPC IN C.C.NO.510/2018, PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE I CJM AT MANGALORE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR NON COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE OBJECTIONS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Though time was granted on four occasions to comply with office objections, petitioners have not complied with.
3
Accordingly the petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC should be allowed or dismissed for non-compliance with office objections.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Ambika G Nayak and Sri Vasudeva Prabhu
The State of Karnataka
Inspectors, Police and CCB
Ganesh S. Nayak
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
