Dismissed
Yelahanka Merchants v. Naresh R Bhat
Karnataka HCCRL.A/173/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.173 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
YELAHANKA MERCHANTS FINANCE CO, BY PASS, B.B.ROAD, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE - 560 064, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, AND GPA HOLDER, SMT GIRIJA, W/O GARUDAPPA, (BY SRI. M.SUBRAMANI, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
… APPELLANT
AND:
NARESH R BHAT S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.18/1, RANGANTHAPURA, MAIN ROAD, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE - 560 003.
...RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 3/12/2014, PASSED BY THE XVIII A.C.M.M AND XX ASCJ BANGALORE AT BANGALORE IN C.C.29366/2006; b) TO REMAND BACK THE MATTER BY RESTORING THE CASE AND BY PROVIDING AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE COMPLAINANT AND TO
2
PROCEED WITH THE MATTER, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation on behalf of the appellant.
lapse of so many years, the appellant, who is the complainant has not chosen to take steps by furnishing correct address of the respondent/accused.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MDS
YELAHANKA MERCHANTS FINANCE CO
NARESH R BHAT
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court