Smt Sumitra L v. Smt C Manjula
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal filed challenging acquittal in cheque dishonour case dismissed for non-prosecution as appellant absent despite court notice.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
CRL.A.No.16/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.16/2018
BETWEEN : SMT.SUMITRA L W/O NARAYAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.44, ‘LOKAMATHA NILAYA’ 6TH MAIN, JNANAJYOTHINAGAR GNANABHARATHI POST BANGALORE – 560 056 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.ANIL KUMAR H S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND :
SMT.C.MANJULA W/O LATE NARAYAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS WORKING AS BMTC CONDUCTOR CHANDRA LAYOUT BMTC DEPOT BMTC DEPOT NO.17, CHANDRA LAYOUT BANGALORE – 560 072 ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.AKARSH S KANADE, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.11.2017 PASSED BY THE XXIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANG1ALORE IN C.C.NO.4737/2013-ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Sumitra L W/o Narayan
- respondent
Smt. C. Manjula W/o Late Narayan
Coram
K.S. Mudagal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.A/16/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court