Court dismissed the criminal petition for anticipatory bail as infructuous after the FIR underlying it was quashed by this Court, following a memo from the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1333/2022
BETWEEN:
K.KIRAN KUMAR S/O H. KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2/2, 2ND MAIN ROAD, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560023. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI MAHAMMED PASHA C., ADVOCATE [THROUGH VC])
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BASAVESHWARANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT CAMPUS BENGALURU-560001. … RESPONDENT
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.196/2021 OF BASAVESHWARA NAGAR P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.323, 324, 354, 504, 506 R/W. SEC.34 OF IPC
2
ON THE FILE OF THE 5TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition stating that the petition has become infructuous, since this Court has quashed the FIR of the respondent police station in which the relief of anticipatory bail was sought.
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
K. Kiran Kumar
State of Karnataka
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
