Criminal Appeal filed by appellant convicted under Sections 376, 506, and 392 IPC. The appeal was subsequently withdrawn by the appellant's counsel. Court dismissed the appeal on meritless grounds as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.A.1292/2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mrs .JUSTICE K S MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1292/2021
BETWEEN:
LOHITH NAIKA S/O LAKSHMANA NAIKA AGED 29 YEARS BUS CONDUCTOR R/O HOSALLI THANDYA TARIKERE TALUK-577 228 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT (BY SRI CHAKRAVARTHY T.S., ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER AJJAMPURA POLICE STATION TARIKERE RURAL CIRCLE CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 547 NOW REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI: SHANKAR H.S.,HCGP)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 30.11.2019 AND SENTENCE DATED
Crl.A.1292/2021 2
06.12.2019 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU IN S.C.NO.59/2018, CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 376, 506 AND 392 OF IPC, ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Recording the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant for withdrawal of the appeal, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
*sp
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lohith Naika S/o Lakshmana Naika
The State of Karnataka
Mrs. Justice K S Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
