Petitioners, via memo filed by counsel, sought dismissal of the criminal petition as not pressed. The court recorded the memo and dismissed the petition as not pressed order.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1131 OF 2022
BETWEEN
... PETITIONERS
[BY SRI. RADHANANDAN B.S, ADV.]
AND
2
... RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI. B.J.ROHITH, HCGP FOR R1, SRI. PRADEEP H.S, ADV. FOR R2]
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRL. PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY R.2 IN PCR.NO.505/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I A.C.J.M, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 406 & 420 OF IPC AT ANNEX-A & ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
files a memo seeking dismissal of the petition as not pressed.
2. Memo is placed on record.
The criminal petition is dismissed as not pressed.
KG
Sd/JUDGE
Mr. Ram Mohan Vora and M/s. S. Splendid Properties
State of Karnataka
Sri. K. Hanuman Singh
M. Nagapranna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
