Appellant withdrew criminal appeal seeking revision of conviction under IPC 304B (dowry death) based on consideration for release on good conduct. Court dismissed appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.A.No.1101/2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101/2016
BETWEEN :
PRABHUSWAMY S/O HENNUMAMAMANA NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O KARADAKERE VILLAGE MADDUR TALUK – 571 436
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI G.S.MURALIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND :
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY K.M.DODDI POLICE MANDYA DISTRICT REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SHANKAR H.S., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 29.09.2015 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA IN S.C.NO.18/2012-CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 304B OF IPC, THE APPELLANT IS SENTENCED TO UNDERGO RIGOROUS IMPRISONMENT FOR 10 YEARS AND PAY FINE OF RS.10,000/FURTHER IN DEFAULT TO PAY FINE, HE SHALL UNDERGO
CRL.A.No.1101/2016
2
SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR 6 MONTHS FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 304B OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed memo for withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the appellant’s name is being considered for release on good conduct.
as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
pgg
2 provisions across 2 enactments
PRABHUSWAMY S/O HENNUMAMAMANA NINGEGOWDA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
K.S.MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
