Sangappa S/O Irappa Sudi v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Three connected criminal petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash FIR and claim sanction for prosecution were disposed of. The Court accepted counsel's submission that the petitions have become infructuous as police had filed a B report. No substantive legal principle on Section 197 sanction was laid down.
What did the court decide?
Petitions disposed of as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 100817 of 2017 C/W CRL.P No. 100613 of 2017, CRL.P No. 100672 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100817 OF 2017 (482-)
C/W
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100613 OF 2017 CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100672 OF 2017
IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100817 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
SANGAPPA S/O IRAPPA SUDI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: REVENUE INSPECTOR, MUDHOL, R/O: MAHALINGAPUR, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings remain maintainable after police has filed a B report indicating no further investigation required.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sangappa S/o Irappa Sudi
- respondent
Ghanasayed S/o Abdulsab Kabadi
- respondent
The State of Karnataka
- petitioner
Prabhakar S/o. Melappa Yadannavar
- petitioner
Dattatraya S/o. Balavantrao Deshpande
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/100817/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court