An appeal where counsel submitted that the reliefs became infructuous due to subsequent events. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
COMMERCIAL APPEAL No.141/2021
BETWEEN:
(By Ms./Smt. Desiree Pail, Adv. for Sri Vivek Holla, Adv.)
2
AND:
3
ASHOK NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560025.
(By Ms. Priya, Adv. for Sri George Joseph, Adv.)
This Commercial Appeal is filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2016 r/w Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to Call for the records in Com.A.S.No. 153/2018 pending on the file of the LXXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru City (CCH-84) in Com.A.S.No. 153/2018 and set aside the order dated 22/06/2021 passed on I.A.No. 03/2021 in Com.A.S.No. 153/2018 by the LXXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru City (CCH-84) (Annexure-A) and allow the I.A.No.3 in Com.A.S.No. 153/2018, filed by appellants under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, 1908 r/w Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, etc.
This appeal coming on for Admission, this day, Alok Aradhe J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
4
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KK
M/s. Nitesh Indiranagar Retail Private Limited (Presently known as M/s. Nirpl Ventures Private Limited) and M/s. Nitesh Estates Limited
Smt. Chitra Poornima and Ors.
Alok Aradhe
S. Vishwajith Shetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
