A contempt petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act challenging non-compliance with a previous order. The court accepted counsel's submission that respondents had complied, leading to dismissal.
Contempt proceedings disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
C.C.C. NO.708/2022
BETWEEN:
GURUNATH VADDE S/O VAJINATH VADDE AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.14, SANTHOSH COLONY, AURAD (B) BIDAR DISTRICT - 585 326. ...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI B. GOWDAR, ADV.)
AND:
BIDAR - 585 401.
2
(BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR, AGA FOR A-1)
THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1972, PRAYING TO INITIATE THE CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR FRAGRANT DISOBEDIENCE OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.17259/2021 DATED 09.12.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, PLEASE KINDLY INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED.
THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits
that the respondents have complied with the directions contained in the order dated 09.12.2021.
3
the petitioner to assail the order, if so advised, in
accordance with law.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
KK
Gurunath Vadde
Dr. M.V. Prasad
R. Venkatesh Kumar
Govinda Reddy
The State of Karnataka
Allok Aradhe
S. Vishvajith Shetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
