Dismissed
Shilpa. S v. Sri. Manoj Kumar
Karnataka HCCCC/1675/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 1675 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. 1675 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CCC No. 1675 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. S. HEMALEKHA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1675 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SMT. RANJITA K .S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: High Court of Karnataka
…ACCUSED
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT BY THE COMPLAINANT PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF
CCC No. 1675 of 2019
THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P.NO.13277/2018 DATED 18.07.2019 AND ISSUE SUCH OTHER DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS AS DEEM FIT AND NECESSARY IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING THE COST OF THIS PETITION.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, B.VEERAPPA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Case called twice. Though the matter is of the year 2019 and is coming up before the Court for the 5th time, none appeared for the complainant nor complied the office the office objections. This clearly depicts that the complainant is not interested in pursuing the contempt petition.
In view of the above, we have no option except to dismiss the contempt petition.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed for
default.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
GSS
B. Veerappa
K. S. Hemalekha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court