Sri N Shivalingaiah v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for mandamus to stop illegal quarrying was dismissed as withdrawn by the Court upon admission of the petitioner.
Writ petition filed for mandamus to stop illegal quarrying was dismissed as withdrawn by the Court upon admission of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.7484/2021 (GM-MM/S)
BETWEEN
SRI N SHIVALINGAIAH S/O LATE NINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.317, K HONNALAGERE VILLAGE MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 428 ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI MAHESH KIRAN SHETTY, ADV. FOR SRI VAIDYA RAVI LAXMINARAYANA, ADV.)
AND:
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001
3 . THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA KHANIJA BHAVANA BANGALORE-560 001
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.S.MAHENDRA, AGA)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO TAKE ALL REQUIRED STEPS AND ENSURE THAT NO ILLEGAL QUARRYING ACTIVITY WHATSOEVER IS UNDERTAKEN IN THE QUARRYING LEASED AREA VIDE QUARRY LEASE NO. 974 BY ANY MISCREANTS AND THE PETITIONER IS AFFORDED WITH ALL SAFEGUARDS AND PROTECTIONS TO CARRY OUT HIS QUARRYING ACTIVITIES IN TERMS WITH THE QL NO.974 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IN TERMS OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15/02/2021 AT ANNEXURE-N AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri Mahesh Kiran Shetty, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Ravi L. Vaidya, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has stated before this Court that he is having instructions to withdraw the present writ petition.
He is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. He is
also permitted to file a memo to that effect in the office.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SD/-
JUDGE
CS
Sri N Shivalingaiyah
State of Karnataka
Satish Chandra Sharma
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court