The High Court of Karnataka granted leave to withdraw a writ petition filed to quash orders. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.6592/2018(GM-ST/RN)
BETWEEN :
Puravankara Projects Ltd., (Presently known Puravankara Limited) A Company incorporated under the Provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 Having its Registered Office at: No.130/1, Ulsoor Road Bengaluru-560 042 Herein represented by its Authorised Signatory And Sr.Vice President – Legal S.John Vijayakumar .. Petitioner
(By Sri Ananda Rama K.,, Advocate for M/s.Anandarama & Prashanth))
AND :
2 -
Varsova Layout, C.V.Raman Nagar Bengaluru-560 093
(By Sri M.Vinod Kumar, AGA for R1 & R2 R3 to R6 – notice dispensed with)
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order at Annexure-A, dated 30.8.2017 passed by the Hon’ble Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.668/2008 and also the impugned order at Anenxure-J, dated 10.12.2007 passed by R1 in proceedings No.46-A/K/1-2006-07, etc.
This writ petition coming on for orders, this day the Court made the following:-
O R D E R
Shri Ananda Rama K., learned advocate for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 30.11.2020 seeking leave to withdraw this petition.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
*ck/-
Puravankara Projects Ltd.
The District Registrar & Deputy Commissioner for Detection of under valuation of Stamps
The Sub-Registrar Krishnarajapuram
Mr.Suresh Salariya
Mr.Rohit Salariya
Mr.V.Mohammed Shafiulla
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
