A writ petition filed under Article 226 Constitution and Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying main matter was already disposed of by the Trial Court.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6302/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION No.6302/2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
MR. B.T.RANGE GOWDA S/O THIMMARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/A. BEDARA AGRAHARA VILLAGE VAJJANAKURIKE POST KOLALA HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. DR.M.SUNIL SASTRY, ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REP. BY THEIR MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN ALL RESIDING AT THIMMAIAH COMPOUND KOTHITHOPU, TUMKUR CITY-572 101
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADV.)
W.P.No.6302/2017
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE AT FAMILY COURT AT TUMKUR VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 21.11.2016 IN C.MISC.NO.135/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-C IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING – B GROUP THIS DAY, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
before the Trial Court the main matter itself is disposed of. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
KG
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MR. B.T.RANGE GOWDA
SMT NALINA
KUM. HAMSINI B.R.
KUM. HEMA B.R.
K.S. MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
